1
0
forked from aniani/vim

patch 8.2.4384: Vim9: error message not tested, some code not tested

Problem:    Vim9: error message not tested, some code not tested.
Solution:   Add a couple of test cases.  Give an error for a command modifier
            without a command.
This commit is contained in:
Bram Moolenaar
2022-02-14 21:19:04 +00:00
parent 7a3b802bab
commit bc51006402
6 changed files with 31 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@@ -2791,7 +2791,8 @@ EXTERN char e_missing_argument_type_for_str[]
// E1080 unused
EXTERN char e_cannot_unlet_str[]
INIT(= N_("E1081: Cannot unlet %s"));
// E1082 unused
EXTERN char e_command_modifier_without_command[]
INIT(= N_("E1082: Command modifier without command"));
EXTERN char e_missing_backtick[]
INIT(= N_("E1083: Missing backtick"));
EXTERN char e_cannot_delete_vim9_script_function_str[]

View File

@@ -2784,6 +2784,7 @@ parse_command_modifiers(
{
char_u *p;
int starts_with_colon = FALSE;
int vim9script = in_vim9script();
CLEAR_POINTER(cmod);
cmod->cmod_flags = sticky_cmdmod_flags;
@@ -2819,12 +2820,18 @@ parse_command_modifiers(
if (eap->nextcmd != NULL)
++eap->nextcmd;
}
if (vim9script && has_cmdmod(cmod, FALSE))
*errormsg = _(e_command_modifier_without_command);
return FAIL;
}
if (*eap->cmd == NUL)
{
if (!skip_only)
{
ex_pressedreturn = TRUE;
if (vim9script && has_cmdmod(cmod, FALSE))
*errormsg = _(e_command_modifier_without_command);
}
return FAIL;
}
@@ -2838,7 +2845,7 @@ parse_command_modifiers(
// verbose[expr] = 2
// But not:
// verbose [a, b] = list
if (in_vim9script())
if (vim9script)
{
char_u *s, *n;
@@ -2915,7 +2922,7 @@ parse_command_modifiers(
#ifdef FEAT_EVAL
// in ":filter #pat# cmd" # does not
// start a comment
&& (!in_vim9script() || VIM_ISWHITE(p[1]))
&& (!vim9script || VIM_ISWHITE(p[1]))
#endif
))
break;
@@ -2928,7 +2935,7 @@ parse_command_modifiers(
}
#ifdef FEAT_EVAL
// Avoid that "filter(arg)" is recognized.
if (in_vim9script() && !VIM_ISWHITE(p[-1]))
if (vim9script && !VIM_ISWHITE(p[-1]))
break;
#endif
if (skip_only)

View File

@@ -350,6 +350,11 @@ def Test_assign_unpack()
assert_equal(1, v1)
assert_equal(2, v2)
var _x: number
[_x, v2] = [6, 7]
assert_equal(6, _x)
assert_equal(7, v2)
var reslist = []
for text in ['aaa {bbb} ccc', 'ddd {eee} fff']
var before: string
@@ -1481,6 +1486,7 @@ def Test_assign_dict()
v9.CheckDefFailure(["var d: dict<number> = {a: '', b: true}"], 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected dict<number> but got dict<any>', 1)
v9.CheckDefFailure(["var d: dict<dict<number>> = {x: {a: '', b: true}}"], 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected dict<dict<number>> but got dict<dict<any>>', 1)
v9.CheckDefFailure(["var d = {x: 1}", "d[1 : 2] = {y: 2}"], 'E1165: Cannot use a range with an assignment: d[1 : 2] =', 2)
enddef
def Test_assign_dict_unknown_type()

View File

@@ -1133,6 +1133,16 @@ def Test_useless_command_modifier()
silent endtry
END
v9.CheckDefAndScriptFailure(lines, 'E1176:', 3)
lines =<< trim END
leftabove
END
v9.CheckDefAndScriptFailure(lines, 'E1082:', 1)
lines =<< trim END
leftabove # comment
END
v9.CheckDefAndScriptFailure(lines, 'E1082:', 1)
enddef
def Test_eval_command()

View File

@@ -750,6 +750,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
/**/
4384,
/**/
4383,
/**/

View File

@@ -2761,13 +2761,7 @@ compile_def_function(
cctx.ctx_has_cmdmod = FALSE;
if (parse_command_modifiers(&ea, &errormsg, &local_cmdmod, FALSE)
== FAIL)
{
if (errormsg != NULL)
goto erret;
// empty line or comment
line = (char_u *)"";
continue;
}
goto erret;
generate_cmdmods(&cctx, &local_cmdmod);
undo_cmdmod(&local_cmdmod);