forked from aniani/vim
patch 9.0.2143: [security]: buffer-overflow in ex_substitute
Problem: [security]: buffer-overflow in ex_substitute Solution: clear memory after allocating When allocating the new_start pointer in ex_substitute() the memory pointer points to some garbage that the following for loop in ex_cmds.c:4743 confuses and causes it to accessing the new_start pointer beyond it's size, leading to a buffer-overlow. So fix this by using alloc_clear() instead of alloc(), which will clear the memory by NUL and therefore cause the loop to terminate correctly. Reported by @henices, thanks! closes: #13596 Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4650,7 +4650,7 @@ ex_substitute(exarg_T *eap)
|
||||
* too many calls to alloc()/free()).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
new_start_len = needed_len + 50;
|
||||
if ((new_start = alloc(new_start_len)) == NULL)
|
||||
if ((new_start = alloc_clear(new_start_len)) == NULL)
|
||||
goto outofmem;
|
||||
*new_start = NUL;
|
||||
new_end = new_start;
|
||||
@@ -4667,7 +4667,7 @@ ex_substitute(exarg_T *eap)
|
||||
if (needed_len > (int)new_start_len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
new_start_len = needed_len + 50;
|
||||
if ((p1 = alloc(new_start_len)) == NULL)
|
||||
if ((p1 = alloc_clear(new_start_len)) == NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
vim_free(new_start);
|
||||
goto outofmem;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user