1
0
forked from aniani/vim

patch 8.2.0188: Check commands don't work well with Vim9 script

Problem:    Check commands don't work well with Vim9 script.
Solution:   Improve constant expression handling.
This commit is contained in:
Bram Moolenaar
2020-01-31 22:12:41 +01:00
parent 0b76ad53b3
commit 7f829cab35
4 changed files with 77 additions and 40 deletions

View File

@@ -3460,14 +3460,31 @@ new_scope(cctx_T *cctx, scopetype_T type)
}
/*
* Evaluate an expression that is a constant: has(arg)
* Evaluate an expression that is a constant:
* has(arg)
*
* Also handle:
* ! in front logical NOT
*
* Return FAIL if the expression is not a constant.
*/
static int
evaluate_const_expr4(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx UNUSED, typval_T *tv)
evaluate_const_expr7(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx UNUSED, typval_T *tv)
{
typval_T argvars[2];
char_u *start_leader, *end_leader;
/*
* Skip '!' characters. They are handled later.
*/
start_leader = *arg;
while (**arg == '!')
*arg = skipwhite(*arg + 1);
end_leader = *arg;
/*
* Recognize only has() for now.
*/
if (STRNCMP("has(", *arg, 4) != 0)
return FAIL;
*arg = skipwhite(*arg + 4);
@@ -3497,6 +3514,13 @@ evaluate_const_expr4(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx UNUSED, typval_T *tv)
f_has(argvars, tv);
clear_tv(&argvars[0]);
while (start_leader < end_leader)
{
if (*start_leader == '!')
tv->vval.v_number = !tv->vval.v_number;
++start_leader;
}
return OK;
}
@@ -3529,7 +3553,7 @@ evaluate_const_and_or(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx, char *op, typval_T *tv)
*arg = skipwhite(p + 2);
tv2.v_type = VAR_UNKNOWN;
if ((opchar == '|' ? evaluate_const_expr3(arg, cctx, &tv2)
: evaluate_const_expr4(arg, cctx, &tv2)) == FAIL)
: evaluate_const_expr7(arg, cctx, &tv2)) == FAIL)
{
clear_tv(&tv2);
return FAIL;
@@ -3558,7 +3582,7 @@ evaluate_const_and_or(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx, char *op, typval_T *tv)
evaluate_const_expr3(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx, typval_T *tv)
{
// evaluate the first expression
if (evaluate_const_expr4(arg, cctx, tv) == FAIL)
if (evaluate_const_expr7(arg, cctx, tv) == FAIL)
return FAIL;
// || and && work almost the same