1
0
forked from aniani/vim

patch 9.0.2057: Vim9: no strict type checks for funcrefs varargs

Problem:  Vim9: no strict type checks for funcrefs varargs
Solution: Perform strict type checking when declaring funcrefs
          with vararg declaration, add tests

closes: #13397

Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Co-authored-by: Ernie Rael <errael@raelity.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ernie Rael
2023-10-21 11:45:38 +02:00
committed by Christian Brabandt
parent d3e277f279
commit 3ec6c1fe3b
6 changed files with 38 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -11010,6 +11010,7 @@ vim9-differences vim9.txt /*vim9-differences*
vim9-export vim9.txt /*vim9-export*
vim9-false-true vim9.txt /*vim9-false-true*
vim9-final vim9.txt /*vim9-final*
vim9-func-declaration vim9.txt /*vim9-func-declaration*
vim9-function-defined-later vim9.txt /*vim9-function-defined-later*
vim9-gotchas vim9.txt /*vim9-gotchas*
vim9-ignored-argument vim9.txt /*vim9-ignored-argument*

View File

@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ return value) results in error *E1031* *E1186* .
There is no array type, use list<{type}> instead. For a list constant an
efficient implementation is used that avoids allocating a lot of small pieces
of memory.
*E1005* *E1007*
*vim9-func-declaration* *E1005* *E1007*
A partial and function can be declared in more or less specific ways:
func any kind of function reference, no type
checking for arguments or return value
@@ -1669,6 +1669,26 @@ Same for |extend()|, use |extendnew()| instead, and for |flatten()|, use
|flattennew()| instead. Since |flatten()| is intended to always change the
type, it can not be used in Vim9 script.
Assigning to a funcref with specified arguments (see |vim9-func-declaration|)
does strict type checking of the arguments. For variable number of arguments
the type must match: >
var FuncRef: func(string, number, bool): number
FuncRef = (v1: string, v2: number, v3: bool) => 777 # OK
FuncRef = (v1: string, v2: number, v3: number) => 777 # Error!
# variable number of arguments must have same type
var FuncVA: func(...list<string>): number
FuncVA = (...v: list<number>): number => v # Error!
FuncVA = (...v: list<any>): number => v # OK, `any` runtime check
FuncVA = (v1: string, v: string2): number => 333 # Error!
FuncVA = (v: list<string>): number => 3 # Error!
If the destinataion funcref has no specified arguments, then there is no
argument type checking: >
var FuncUnknownArgs: func: number
FuncUnknownArgs = (v): number => v # OK
FuncUnknownArgs = (v1: string, v2: string): number => 3 # OK
< FuncUnknownArgs = (...v1: list<string>): number => 333 # OK
*E1211* *E1217* *E1218* *E1219* *E1220* *E1221*
*E1222* *E1223* *E1224* *E1225* *E1226* *E1227*
*E1228* *E1238* *E1250* *E1251* *E1252* *E1256*

View File

@@ -1890,7 +1890,7 @@ def Test_assign_funcref_args()
var FuncAnyVA: func(...any): number
FuncAnyVA = (v): number => v
END
v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected func(...any): number but got func(any): number')
v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1180: Variable arguments type must be a list: any')
# varargs must match
lines =<< trim END
@@ -1898,7 +1898,7 @@ def Test_assign_funcref_args()
var FuncAnyVA: func(...any): number
FuncAnyVA = (v1, v2): number => v1 + v2
END
v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected func(...any): number but got func(any, any): number')
v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1180: Variable arguments type must be a list: any')
# varargs must match
lines =<< trim END
@@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ def Test_assign_funcref_args()
var FuncAnyVA: func(...any): number
FuncAnyVA = (v1: list<any>): number => 3
END
v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected func(...any): number but got func(list<any>): number')
v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1180: Variable arguments type must be a list: any')
enddef
def Test_assign_funcref_arg_any()

View File

@@ -1995,7 +1995,7 @@ def Test_varargs_mismatch()
var res = Map((v) => str2nr(v))
assert_equal(12, res)
END
v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1013: Argument 1: type mismatch, expected func(...any): number but got func(any): number')
v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, 'E1180: Variable arguments type must be a list: any')
enddef
def Test_using_var_as_arg()
@@ -2764,7 +2764,7 @@ def Test_func_type_fails()
v9.CheckDefFailure(['var Ref1: func()', 'Ref1 = g:FuncOneArgRetNumber'], 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected func() but got func(number): number')
v9.CheckDefFailure(['var Ref1: func(bool)', 'Ref1 = g:FuncTwoArgNoRet'], 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected func(bool) but got func(bool, number)')
v9.CheckDefFailure(['var Ref1: func(?bool)', 'Ref1 = g:FuncTwoArgNoRet'], 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected func(?bool) but got func(bool, number)')
v9.CheckDefFailure(['var Ref1: func(...bool)', 'Ref1 = g:FuncTwoArgNoRet'], 'E1012: Type mismatch; expected func(...bool) but got func(bool, number)')
v9.CheckDefFailure(['var Ref1: func(...bool)', 'Ref1 = g:FuncTwoArgNoRet'], 'E1180: Variable arguments type must be a list: bool')
v9.CheckDefFailure(['var RefWrong: func(string ,number)'], 'E1068:')
v9.CheckDefFailure(['var RefWrong: func(string,number)'], 'E1069:')

View File

@@ -704,6 +704,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
/**/
2057,
/**/
2056,
/**/

View File

@@ -1231,6 +1231,15 @@ parse_type(char_u **arg, garray_T *type_gap, int give_error)
type = parse_type(&p, type_gap, give_error);
if (type == NULL)
return NULL;
if ((flags & TTFLAG_VARARGS) != 0
&& type->tt_type != VAR_LIST)
{
char *tofree;
semsg(_(e_variable_arguments_type_must_be_list_str),
type_name(type, &tofree));
vim_free(tofree);
return NULL;
}
arg_type[argcount++] = type;
// Nothing comes after "...{type}".