When "sid" is specified, it returns a List with a single item.
Signed-off-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: filetype: stylus files not recognized
Solution: Detect '*.styl' and '*.stylus' as stylus filetype,
include indent, filetype and syntax plugin
(Philip H)
closes: #14656
Signed-off-by: Philip H <47042125+pheiduck@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: filetype: .out files recognized as tex files
Solution: Do not set an explicit filetype until it is clear what this
should be (shane.xb.qian)
closes: #14670
Signed-off-by: shane.xb.qian <shane.qian@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: Kbuild files are not recognized.
Solution: Detect Kbuild files as make files.
(Bruno Belanyi)
closes: #14676
Signed-off-by: Bruno Belanyi <bruno@belanyi.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: cbuffer and similar quickfix and locationlist commands don't
accept a range, even so it is documented they should
(ilan-schemoul, after 8.1.1241)
Solution: Define ex commands with ADDR_LINES instead of ADDR_OTHER
fixes: #14638closes: #14657
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
There is a flaw in the current implementation that has been
exacerbated around v5.2. It lies in the recognition of all
three indentation styles simultaneously: a tab, two space,
and eight space character(s). With it, it is not uncommon
to misidentify various constructs as method declarations
when they belong to two-space indented members and other
blocks of a type and are offset at eight space characters or
a tab from the start of the line.
For example,
------------------------------------------------------------
class Test
{
static String hello() { return "hello"; }
public static void main(String[] args)
{
try {
if (args.length > 0) {
// FIXME: eight spaces.
System.out.println(args[0]);
} else {
// FIXME: a tab.
System.out.println(hello());
}
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new Error(e);
}
}
}
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
:let g:java_highlight_functions = 'indent'
:doautocmd Syntax
------------------------------------------------------------
A better approach is to pick an only indentation style out
of all supported styles (so either two spaces _or_ eight
spaces _or_ a tab). Note that tabs and spaces can still be
mixed, only the leading tab or the leading run of spaces
matters for the recognition. And there is no reason to not
complement the set of valid styles with any number of spaces
from 1 to 8, inclusively.
Please proceed with the necessary change as follows:
- rename from "indent" to "indent2" for a 2-space run;
- rename from "indent" to "indent8" for an 8-space run;
- continue to have "indent" for a tab run;
- define an "indent" variable with a suffix number denoting
the preferred amount of indentation for any other run of
spaces [1-8].
As before, this alternative style of recognition of method
declarations still does not prescribe naming conventions and
still cannot recognise method declarations in nested types
that are conventionally indented.
The proposed changes also follow suit of "style" in stopping
the claiming of constructor and enum constant declarations.
Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
closes: #14645
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley <simon@tsimonq2.net>
Signed-off-by: James McCoy <jamessan@jamessan.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
It's an indent script, so we need to set the b:undo_indent variable
instead of the b:undo_ftplugin var.
fixes: #14602
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
- Request the new regexp engine (v7.3.970) for [:upper:] and
[:lower:].
- Recognise declarations of in-line annotated methods.
- Recognise declarations of _strictfp_ methods.
- Establish partial order for method modifiers as shown in
the MethodModifier production; namely, _public_ and
friends should be written the leftmost, possibly followed
by _abstract_ or _default_, or possibly followed by other
modifiers.
- Stop looking for parameterisable primitive types (void<?>,
int<Object>, etc., are malformed).
- Stop looking for arrays of _void_.
- Acknowledge the prevailing convention for method names to
begin with a small letter and for class/interface names to
begin with a capital letter; and, therefore, desist from
claiming declarations of enum constants and constructors
with javaFuncDef.
Rationale:
+ Constructor is distinct from method:
* its (overloaded) name is not arbitrary;
* its return type is implicit;
* its _throws_ clause depends on indirect vagaries of
instance (variable) initialisers;
* its invocation makes other constructors of its type
hierarchy invoked one by one, concluding with the
primordial constructor;
* its explicit invocation, via _this_ or _super_, can
only appear as the first statement in a constructor
(not anymore, see JEP 447); else, its _super_ call
cannot appear in constructors of _record_ or _enum_;
and neither invocation is allowed for the primordial
constructor;
* it is not a member of its class, like initialisers,
and is never inherited;
* it is never _abstract_ or _native_.
+ Constructor declarations tend to be few in number and
merit visual recognition from method declarations.
+ Enum constants define a fixed set of type instances
and more resemble class variable initialisers.
Note that the code duplicated for @javaFuncParams is written
keeping in mind for g:java_highlight_functions a pending 3rd
variant, which would require none of the :syn-cluster added
groups.
closes: #14620
Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: filetype: ondir files are not recognized
Solution: Detect '.ondirrc' as ondir filetype
(Jon Parise)
closes: #14604
Signed-off-by: Jon Parise <jon@indelible.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
I somehow messed up the previous patch, I think a copy-paste error when
creating the file.
Blueprint files have C and C++ style comments, not shell-like '#'
comments.
Signed-off-by: Bruno BELANYI <bruno@belanyi.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
