updated for version 7.3.550

Problem:    With "j" in 'formatoptions' a list leader is not removed. (Gary
            Johnson)
Solution:   Don't ignore the start of a three part comment. (Lech Lorens)

src/ops.c

@@ -4250,15 +4250,13 @@ skip_comment(line, process, include_space, is_comment)
 	return line;
 
     /* Find:
-     * - COM_START,
      * - COM_END,
      * - colon,
      * whichever comes first.
      */
     while (*comment_flags)
     {
-	if (*comment_flags == COM_START
+	if (*comment_flags == COM_END
-		|| *comment_flags == COM_END
 		|| *comment_flags == ':')
 	{
 	    break;
@@ -4267,9 +4265,8 @@ skip_comment(line, process, include_space, is_comment)
     }
 
     /* If we found a colon, it means that we are not processing a line
-     * starting with an opening or a closing part of a three-part
+     * starting with a closing part of a three-part comment. That's good,
-     * comment. That's good, because we don't want to remove those as
+     * because we don't want to remove those as this would be annoying.
-     * this would be annoying.
      */
     if (*comment_flags == ':' || *comment_flags == NUL)
 	line += lead_len;

src/testdir/test29.in

@@ -103,12 +103,15 @@ if (condition) // Remove the next comment leader!
 
 STARTTEST
 /^{/+1
-:set comments=s1:/*,mb:*,ex:*/,://
+:set comments=sO:*\ -,mO:*\ \ ,exO:*/
+:set comments+=s1:/*,mb:*,ex:*/,://
 :set comments+=s1:>#,mb:#,ex:#<,:<
 :set cpoptions-=j joinspaces fo=j
 :set backspace=eol,start
 :.,+3join
 j4J
+:.,+8join
+j9J
 :.,+2join
 j3J
 :.,+2join
@@ -132,6 +135,24 @@ ENDTEST
 /*
  * Make sure the previous comment leader is not removed.
  */
+
+/* List:
+ * - item1
+ *   foo bar baz
+ *   foo bar baz
+ * - item2
+ *   foo bar baz
+ *   foo bar baz
+ */
+
+/* List:
+ * - item1
+ *   foo bar baz
+ *   foo bar baz
+ * - item2
+ *   foo bar baz
+ *   foo bar baz
+ */
 
 // Should the next comment leader be left alone?
 // Yes.

src/testdir/test29.ok

@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ if (condition) // Remove the next comment leader! OK, I will.
 {
 /* Make sure the previous comment leader is not removed.  */
 /* Make sure the previous comment leader is not removed.  */
+/* List: item1 foo bar baz foo bar baz item2 foo bar baz foo bar baz */
+/* List: item1 foo bar baz foo bar baz item2 foo bar baz foo bar baz */
 // Should the next comment leader be left alone?  Yes.
 // Should the next comment leader be left alone?  Yes.
 /* Here the comment leader should be left intact. */ // And so should this one.

src/version.c

@@ -714,6 +714,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
 
 static int included_patches[] =
 {   /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+    550,
 /**/
     549,
 /**/