mirror of
https://github.com/vim/vim.git
synced 2025-09-23 03:43:49 -04:00
patch 8.2.0188: Check commands don't work well with Vim9 script
Problem: Check commands don't work well with Vim9 script. Solution: Improve constant expression handling.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
|
||||
source shared.vim
|
||||
|
||||
command -nargs=1 MissingFeature throw 'Skipped: ' .. <args> .. ' feature missing'
|
||||
|
||||
" Command to check for the presence of a feature.
|
||||
command -nargs=1 CheckFeature call CheckFeature(<f-args>)
|
||||
func CheckFeature(name)
|
||||
if !has(a:name)
|
||||
throw 'Skipped: ' .. a:name .. ' feature missing'
|
||||
MissingFeature a:name
|
||||
endif
|
||||
endfunc
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -31,7 +31,9 @@ def Test_expr1()
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal('two', false ? 'one' : 'two')
|
||||
assert_equal('two', 0 ? 'one' : 'two')
|
||||
assert_equal('two', 0.0 ? 'one' : 'two')
|
||||
if has('float')
|
||||
assert_equal('two', 0.0 ? 'one' : 'two')
|
||||
endif
|
||||
assert_equal('two', '' ? 'one' : 'two')
|
||||
" assert_equal('one', 0z ? 'one' : 'two')
|
||||
assert_equal('two', [] ? 'one' : 'two')
|
||||
@@ -420,22 +422,25 @@ def Test_expr5()
|
||||
enddef
|
||||
|
||||
def Test_expr5_float()
|
||||
CheckFeature float
|
||||
assert_equal(66.0, 60.0 + 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(66.0, 60.0 + 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(66.0, 60 + 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(5.1, g:afloat + 5)
|
||||
assert_equal(8.1, 8 + g:afloat)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.1, g:anint + g:afloat)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.1, g:afloat + g:anint)
|
||||
if !has('float')
|
||||
MissingFeature 'float'
|
||||
else
|
||||
assert_equal(66.0, 60.0 + 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(66.0, 60.0 + 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(66.0, 60 + 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(5.1, g:afloat + 5)
|
||||
assert_equal(8.1, 8 + g:afloat)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.1, g:anint + g:afloat)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.1, g:afloat + g:anint)
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal(54.0, 60.0 - 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(54.0, 60.0 - 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(54.0, 60 - 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(-4.9, g:afloat - 5)
|
||||
assert_equal(7.9, 8 - g:afloat)
|
||||
assert_equal(9.9, g:anint - g:afloat)
|
||||
assert_equal(-9.9, g:afloat - g:anint)
|
||||
assert_equal(54.0, 60.0 - 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(54.0, 60.0 - 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(54.0, 60 - 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(-4.9, g:afloat - 5)
|
||||
assert_equal(7.9, 8 - g:afloat)
|
||||
assert_equal(9.9, g:anint - g:afloat)
|
||||
assert_equal(-9.9, g:afloat - g:anint)
|
||||
endif
|
||||
enddef
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_expr5_fails()
|
||||
@@ -476,27 +481,29 @@ def Test_expr6()
|
||||
enddef
|
||||
|
||||
def Test_expr6_float()
|
||||
CheckFeature float
|
||||
if !has('float')
|
||||
MissingFeature 'float'
|
||||
else
|
||||
assert_equal(36.0, 6.0 * 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(36.0, 6 * 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(36.0, 6.0 * 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(1.0, g:afloat * g:anint)
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal(36.0, 6.0 * 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(36.0, 6 * 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(36.0, 6.0 * 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(1.0, g:afloat * g:anint)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.0, 60 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.0, 60.0 / 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.0, 60.0 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(0.01, g:afloat / g:anint)
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal(10.0, 60 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.0, 60.0 / 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(10.0, 60.0 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(0.01, g:afloat / g:anint)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4 / 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6 * 4.0 / 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6 * 4 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4.0 / 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6 * 4.0 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4.0 / 6.0)
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4 / 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6 * 4.0 / 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6 * 4 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4.0 / 6)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6 * 4.0 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4.0 / 6.0)
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4.0 / 6.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(4.0, 6.0 * 4.0 / 6.0)
|
||||
endif
|
||||
enddef
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_expr6_fails()
|
||||
@@ -581,7 +588,9 @@ enddef
|
||||
|
||||
def Test_expr7_float()
|
||||
" float constant
|
||||
if has('float')
|
||||
if !has('float')
|
||||
MissingFeature 'float'
|
||||
else
|
||||
assert_equal(g:float_zero, .0)
|
||||
assert_equal(g:float_zero, 0.0)
|
||||
assert_equal(g:float_neg, -9.8)
|
||||
|
@@ -742,6 +742,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
|
||||
|
||||
static int included_patches[] =
|
||||
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
|
||||
/**/
|
||||
188,
|
||||
/**/
|
||||
187,
|
||||
/**/
|
||||
|
@@ -3460,14 +3460,31 @@ new_scope(cctx_T *cctx, scopetype_T type)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Evaluate an expression that is a constant: has(arg)
|
||||
* Evaluate an expression that is a constant:
|
||||
* has(arg)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Also handle:
|
||||
* ! in front logical NOT
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Return FAIL if the expression is not a constant.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
evaluate_const_expr4(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx UNUSED, typval_T *tv)
|
||||
evaluate_const_expr7(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx UNUSED, typval_T *tv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
typval_T argvars[2];
|
||||
char_u *start_leader, *end_leader;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Skip '!' characters. They are handled later.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
start_leader = *arg;
|
||||
while (**arg == '!')
|
||||
*arg = skipwhite(*arg + 1);
|
||||
end_leader = *arg;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Recognize only has() for now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (STRNCMP("has(", *arg, 4) != 0)
|
||||
return FAIL;
|
||||
*arg = skipwhite(*arg + 4);
|
||||
@@ -3497,6 +3514,13 @@ evaluate_const_expr4(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx UNUSED, typval_T *tv)
|
||||
f_has(argvars, tv);
|
||||
clear_tv(&argvars[0]);
|
||||
|
||||
while (start_leader < end_leader)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (*start_leader == '!')
|
||||
tv->vval.v_number = !tv->vval.v_number;
|
||||
++start_leader;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3529,7 +3553,7 @@ evaluate_const_and_or(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx, char *op, typval_T *tv)
|
||||
*arg = skipwhite(p + 2);
|
||||
tv2.v_type = VAR_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
if ((opchar == '|' ? evaluate_const_expr3(arg, cctx, &tv2)
|
||||
: evaluate_const_expr4(arg, cctx, &tv2)) == FAIL)
|
||||
: evaluate_const_expr7(arg, cctx, &tv2)) == FAIL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
clear_tv(&tv2);
|
||||
return FAIL;
|
||||
@@ -3558,7 +3582,7 @@ evaluate_const_and_or(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx, char *op, typval_T *tv)
|
||||
evaluate_const_expr3(char_u **arg, cctx_T *cctx, typval_T *tv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// evaluate the first expression
|
||||
if (evaluate_const_expr4(arg, cctx, tv) == FAIL)
|
||||
if (evaluate_const_expr7(arg, cctx, tv) == FAIL)
|
||||
return FAIL;
|
||||
|
||||
// || and && work almost the same
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user