Files
JargonFile/original/html/S/spamblock.html

18 lines
2.9 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2014-03-27 18:54:56 +00:00
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>spamblock</title><link rel="stylesheet" href="../../jargon.css" type="text/css"/><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.61.0"/><link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="The Jargon File"/><link rel="up" href="../S.html" title="S"/><link rel="previous" href="spam-bait.html" title="spam bait"/><link rel="next" href="spamhaus.html" title="spamhaus"/></head><body><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">spamblock</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="spam-bait.html">Prev</a><EFBFBD></td><th width="60%" align="center">S</th><td width="20%" align="right"><EFBFBD><a accesskey="n" href="spamhaus.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr/></div><dt><a id="spamblock"/><dt xmlns="" id="spamblock"><b>spamblock</b>: <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="pronunciation">/spam<61>blok/</span>, <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="grammar">n.</span></dt></dt><dd><p> [poss. by analogy to sunblock] Text inserted in an email address to
render it invalid and thus useless to spammers. For example, the address
<tt class="email">&lt;<a href="mailto:jrandom@hacker.org">jrandom@hacker.org</a>&gt;</tt> might be transformed to
<tt class="email">&lt;<a href="mailto:jrandom@NOSPAM.hacker.org">jrandom@NOSPAM.hacker.org</a>&gt;</tt>. Adding spamblock to an address
is often referred to as <span class="firstterm">munging</span> it
(see <a href="../M/munge.html"><i class="glossterm">munge</i></a>). This evasion tactic depends on the
fact that most spammers collect names with some sort of <a href="../A/address-harvester.html"><i class="glossterm">address
harvester</i></a> on volumes too high to de-mung by hand, but
individual humans reading an email message can readily spot and remove a
spamblock in the From address.</p><p>Note: This is not actually a very effective tactic, and may already
be passing out of use in early 1999 after about two years of life. In both
mail and news, it's essentially impossible to keep a smart address
harvester from mining out the addresses in the message header and trace
lines. Therefore the only people who can be protected are third parties
mentioned by email address in the message &#8212; not a common enough case
to interest spammers.</p></dd><div class="navfooter"><hr/><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="spam-bait.html">Prev</a><EFBFBD></td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="../S.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"><EFBFBD><a accesskey="n" href="spamhaus.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">spam bait<69></td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="../index.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"><EFBFBD>spamhaus</td></tr></table></div></body></html>